Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-05-07 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-05-07 House Journal Page 1705 SB 104 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 104(JUD) "An Act relating to the crimes of unsworn falsification in the first and second degrees and false information or report; requiring the establishment of a permanent fund dividend fraud investigation unit in the Department of Revenue; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT 4DP 1NR 888 FN1: ZERO(REV) 889 FN2: ZERO(LAW) 889 JUD RPT HCS(JUD) NT 4DP 2NR 1433 FN2: ZERO(LAW) 1434 FN3: ZERO(REV) 1490 2005-05-07 House Journal Page 1706 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 104(JUD) "An Act relating to the crimes of unsworn falsification in the first degree involving an application for a permanent fund dividend and false information or report involving eligibility for a permanent fund dividend; requiring the establishment of a permanent fund dividend fraud investigation unit in the Department of Revenue; relating to service in the peace corps and as a member of the United States Olympic Team as allowable absences from the state for purposes of eligibility for permanent fund dividends and to the period for filing an application for a permanent fund dividend; authorizing the Department of Revenue to issue administrative orders imposing sanctions for certain misrepresentations or other actions concerning eligibility for a permanent fund dividend and providing for administrative appeal of those orders; and providing for an effective date." (HCR 15 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 9, line 14, following "volunteer": Insert "or support staff" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative McGuire objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 104(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 2005-05-07 House Journal Page 1707 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gatto, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Thomas, Weyhrauch Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Wilson Absent: Moses, Salmon And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 104(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 104(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 104(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 104(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Absent: Moses And so, HCS CSSB 104(JUD) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2005-05-07 House Journal Page 1708 Representative Berkowitz gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 104(JUD). SB 104 Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HCS CSSB 104(JUD) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 104(JUD) was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 104(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 104(JUD)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, HCS CSSB 104(JUD) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 104(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.